Intelligence: A Unifying Construct for the Social Sciences (pdf). by Richard Lynn & Tatu Vanhanen
Thanks for this. Would it be rude to ask for a copy of the 2nd edition of Dysgenics if you have it?
I’ll keep and eye out for it.
Thanks for that, chuck !
Like BB, I’ll thank you for this upload; and like BB, I’ll risk rudeness by making a request to you––to upload the upcoming PAID issue devoted to Rushton (in particular, the Nyborg interview). I don’t subscribe to academic journals, but I’d love to get a look at this issue.
You can find the articles at the top of the page here.
Just finished reading it. Probably could’ve used a decent proofreader, as there were a number of spelling and grammatical errors. The price of self-publishing, I guess. I noticed Lynn seems to have missed the latest study on Thai national IQ.
Oops. This should read:
The Brazilian IQs were just replicated, though — at least for the general population. And the predicted racial pattern was also found:
Flores-Mendoza, et al, (2012) Considerations about IQ and human capital in Brazil
So, one important hit and one less important miss.
Thanks for providing convenient access to a PDF copy of the new Lynn/Vanhanen book.
On a different matter, you seem to have “disappeared” your earlier posting on Mex-Am Wordsum-IQ which strongly (and incorrectly) criticized my claims, thereby breaking my own link and removing the source for several of my quotes. Obviously, this is your blog and people always wish to hide their mistakes, but I wonder if it wouldn’t be more appropriate to retain the posting and simply append a correction or disclaimer as I had done in my Rural/Urban column.
Finally, I have now published a detailed response to the Lynn/Nyborg rebuttal to my article: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/unz-on-raceiq-response-to-lynn-and-nyborg/
The post was placed under “pending review” because, among other problems, there were a number of typos in one of the charts. I haven’t had a chance to update it, because I have been a bit short of energy. That said, as I noted in reply, you were still incorrect with regards to the GSS data, as least given how group differences are typically calculated. The “Mexican born-AMerican”/White Wordsum difference narrowed from 1 SD to 0.5 SD from the 1980s to the 2000s, not from 1 SD to 0.33 SD.
If I may make a request: Do you have the Meisenberg, Lawless, Lambert, and Newton paper on the Caribbean FE (from Mankind Quarterly, 2005)?
I don’t have access. You can get it from Questia or other sites without paying if you jump through a few hoops.
Those hoops being?
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
<input type="hidden" name="redirect_to" value="" />