A villainless crime?

When those such as Sam Sommers speak of or allude to racism and institutional racism as being the cause of disproportionalities are they picturing a villainless crime? Perhaps I differ from them in that I assume otherwise. I reason, perhaps erroneously, that:

1) Racism and institutional racism implies racists
2) Contemporarily, racists are deemed to be morally wicked
3) Therefore, the claim that such and such a disproportionality is due to racism or institutional racism is equivalent to the claim that there is some group of morally wicked people causing the disparity

This leads me to take the charge seriously. To my mind, accusing some of iniquity is no slight matter.

But perhaps my mistake is that I do take the charge seriously. I reason, perhaps childishly:

1) An accusation of individual or group iniquity is serious
2) Therefore, the case for this accusation should be strong, the evidence for conviction beyond a reasonable doubt

This leads me to vigorously investigate and demand investigation of the situation. Which is what I have been doing. I’m not sure where my reasoning runs afoul. I will confess though, that my thinking has become rather simple, almost embarrassingly so for me and surely so for some of you.

This cognitive simpleness, perhaps, is the true root of my difference with Sommers-like folk. I consider that it’s worse to wrongly accuse (and convict) some of iniquity than to wrongly state (or rightly establish) that some tend to be — in this case — less clever.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to A villainless crime?

  1. Kiwiguy says:

    ***I reason, perhaps childishly:***

    I don’t see anything childish about your reasoning. The assumption of discrimination being the cause of group disparities is flung around quite casually. Probably because there is a grain of historical truth in it and alternative explanations are not acceptable.

    For instance, if you suggested men have shorter lifespans because society is s8xist people would quickly rubbish that suggestion. Historically s8xism has been the other way around and alternative explanations, including genetic ones, are acceptable.

    http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1827162,00.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s