More thoughts on National IQs and HBD
1. IQ (g) differences between individuals can represent either:
(a) environmentally produced biological differences
(b) gene-environmentally produced biological differences
(c) genetically produced biological differences*
2. The Big G differences between Nations (i.e national IQs) can represent either:
(a) “the means of individuals within those nations”
(b) “the levels of intelligence of the nations themselves (of institutions like rational bureaucracies, universities, etc.” (Rindermann, 2007)
Roughly, individual differences in IQ (g) represent differences in the abilities to process information. Given the same input, an individual with a lower IQ (g) will produce a lower output (in the same amount of time). National differences in IQ (G) either represent differences in the aggregated capacity of the individuals or differences in the national institutions which generate the input.
Hereditarians need to show that 2a) is true and that 2a) results from 1c). Establishing 2a) is the first step. Is there evidence that the Big G differences represent aggregated individual IQ (g) differences?
*h^2 = is broad heritability. Which includes additive variance, dominance variance, epistatic variance, and variance due to assortive mating [V(G)=V(A)+V(D)+V(EP)+V(AM)]. Technically, additive variance, or narrow heritability, is only hereditiarian (i.e breeds true). But from the perspective of behavioral “hereditarians,” it doesn’t matter if the difference is due to total genetic variance, V(G) or additive variance (Jensen, 1973; Sesardic, 2005). This is a moot point since non-additive variance effect plays an insignificant role in IQ (g).